Template:Did you know nominations/Muhammad III, Sultan of Granada
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:10, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Muhammad III, Sultan of Granada
[edit]- ... that at the beginning of his reign, Muhammad III allied Granada with Castile and Aragon against the Marinids, while at the end those three powers were allied against it? Source: "Muhammad III had begun his reign by entering into a tripartite alliance against the Marinids. He was now outmaneuvered, and the three alliance was against him." (Harvey p. 170)
- Reviewed: SimetriSiti
5x expanded by HaEr48 (talk). Self-nominated at 07:18, 2 June 2017 (UTC).
- Edwardx, it refers to Granada (Muhammad III's kingdom) and the three are the rest. How about:
- ALT1: ... that at the beginning of his reign, Muhammad III allied Granada with Castile and Aragon against the Marinids, while at the end the other three powers were allied against Granada?
- ALT2: ... that at the beginning of his reign, Muhammad III allied Granada with Castile and Aragon against the Marinids, while at the end Granada was opposed by an alliance of the other three powers?
HaEr48 (talk) 23:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:48, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- Expansion & length okay, no outstanding problems with article. Hook fact verified via Google Books. Allow me to suggest a slight rewording: --Paul_012 (talk) 15:55, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- ALT3: ... that at the beginning of his reign, Muhammad III of Granada allied his kingdom with Castile and Aragon against the Marinids, while at the end those three powers were allied against him?
- Expansion & length okay, no outstanding problems with article. Hook fact verified via Google Books. Allow me to suggest a slight rewording: --Paul_012 (talk) 15:55, 30 June 2017 (UTC)