The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 05:59, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
QPQ: - QPQ not done yet Overall: Article is large enough and new enough. The sources are academic journals and the abstract verifies the hook. The hook in itself is interesting although I feel like the grammar is off? Perhaps an alternative hook can be provided? In any case, all that's left is the QPQ and it should be good to go. Droodkin (talk) 08:10, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
- QPQ not done yet
Article is large enough and new enough. The sources are academic journals and the abstract verifies the hook. The hook in itself is interesting although I feel like the grammar is off? Perhaps an alternative hook can be provided? In any case, all that's left is the QPQ and it should be good to go. Droodkin (talk) 08:10, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
