Template:Did you know nominations/Montgomery Ward Records
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 04:36, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Montgomery Ward Records
- ... that Montgomery Ward had their own record label? Source: "The Montgomery Ward chain inaugerated its own budget label in 1933" [1] - source #1
- ALT1: ... that you could buy ten Montgomery Ward Records for $1.79? Source: "...and were an undeniable bargain at 21¢ each , or 10 for $1.79." Sutton, Allan (2000). American Record Labels and Companies – An Encyclopedia (1891-1943). Mainspring Press page 132 paragraph 1.
- ALT2: ... that Montgomery Ward Records issued material sourced from Eli Oberstein, to which he may not have had rights? Source: "...as well as Oberstein's pseudonymous dubbings from Crown, Gennett, Paramount, and foreign material in Oberstein's possession to which he might not have owned rights." Sutton, Allan (2000). American Record Labels and Companies – An Encyclopedia (1891-1943). Mainspring Press page 132 paragraph 6.
- Reviewed: Damon Severson
Created by 78.26 (talk). Self-nominated at 02:36, 25 November 2021 (UTC).
New article that was moved to mainspace on 23 November 2021 is 2,153 characters and nominated two days later. No copyvios detected (AGF all refs re. any close paraphrasing issues, since none can go through Dup detector). Article is well-sourced. Main hook is 48 characters long (ALT1 is 58; ALT2 is 109); all three are under 200 character max. and are interesting. Ref 1 (verifying the main hook) is a reliable source from Oxford University Press. AGF ref 3 (verifying ALT1 and ALT2) as there is no preview available. QPQ done. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 06:52, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
