Template:Did you know nominations/Miss Indigenous Canada

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 11:49, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Miss Indigenous Canada

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that a CTV News reporter described Miss Indigenous Canada as "not a beauty pageant"?

• Source: "Miss Indigenous Canada was not a beauty pageant, but instead focused on Indigenous traditions, culture and leadership." Lefebvre, Charles (29 July 2024). "'I'm honoured': Manitoba First Nation resident named Miss Indigenous Canada". CTV News Winnipeg. Bell Media. CTV News. Retrieved 31 July 2024.

• ALT1: ... that Miss Indigenous Canada contestants are judged on ambassadorship, character, community service, and cultural involvement? Source: "Contestants are judged on things like character, community service, cultural involvement and ambassadorship." Moqon, Sis (26 July 2024). "Meet the 3 Mi'kmaw women competing to be Miss Indigenous Canada". CBC News. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. CBC News. Retrieved 31 July 2024.
• Reviewed: Bangué
• Comment: Thank you in advance to the reviewer! I'll work on completing the QPQ later today. Completed! If any reviewers may have a more hook-y alternative hook, you are welcome to do so!

Created by Ornithoptera (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 35 past nominations.

Ornithoptera (talk) 01:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC).

• I will review this shortly. Yue🌙 00:27, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Both hooks are verified by the sources given, which are cited in the appropriate places in the article. References were cross-checked for verification and plagiarism; no issues arose. I prefer ALT1 because it is more informative. I think ALT0 would have been more eye-catching if it said the statement definitively, but that isn't possible due to attribution guidelines. Yue🌙 00:48, 5 August 2024 (UTC)