The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:14, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Overall: Excellent sources and interesting hooks. Nomination is posted at the incorrect date, but is still new enough. Some minor problems need resolving:
The main hook is the opinion of a historical figure, and this should be indicated.
In ALT1, the term nazr should be briefly defined inline, as it will otherwise distract from the main subject.
Please also add the citations immediately after the cited hook in the Wiki article per DYK guideline, and since the "chiefest Christian" is a quote, you should add the page number in the citation as well.
Pending the suggested improvements, all three hooks seem very interesting and worthy of nomination. Farang Rak Tham(Talk) 14:22, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for the detailed review. All done apart from explaining Nazr in the hook. It's difficult to define with accuracy anyway and is linked so readers can easily find our more by clicking. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:38, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Okay, great. Two remaining comments:
The comma after Mundy is not required (I could remove it myself, but then a third reviewer needs to review the hook, which is a waste of time.)
Excellent sources and interesting hooks. Nomination is posted at the incorrect date, but is still new enough. Some minor problems need resolving:
Okay, i guess we agree to disagree here. Approving ALT2. I'd prefer the main hook, but the comma is a little odd.