Template:Did you know nominations/Megabat

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:19, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Megabat

(

)

... that in two species of megabat, males can lactate? Source: "However, male lactation has been documented in populations of free-ranging Dayak fruit bats Dyacopterus spadecius in Malaysia (Figure 1) and the masked flying fox Pteropus capistrastus in Papua New Guinea." ([1])
- ALT1:... that in a species of megabat, females likely trade sex for food? Source: "This test revealed a strong relationship be-tween producer-scrounger interactions and reproduction. Specifically, females bore pups of the males from which they often scrounged food" ([2])

Reviewed: Hypericum olympicum

Improved to Good Article status by Enwebb (talk). Self-nominated at 02:48, 3 June 2019 (UTC).

I don't know if I have the time to review this, but while both hooks are good, the first hook is probably the most eye-catching one and perhaps will result in the most interest. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:02, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Reviewing... --Toreightyone (talk) 11:21, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Initial Review:
Article:
Newness: Y - nominated four days after good article promotion
Length: Y - 38 kb
Copyvio Check: Y - unlikely
Neutrality: Y
Grammar: Y - after checking the entire article for grammar, I just realized that it was already thoroughly checked by the Good Article review, but alas, everything checks out
Sources: Y - everything is sourced

Hook:
Length: : Y - <200 characters each
Content: Y - ALT0 is very eye-catching as Naruto mentioned previously, appears in the article
Neutrality: Y
Source: Y - appears in article; information appears in the abstract, but further details are behind a paywall
QPQ: Y

Overall:
Fantastic job Enwebb, I can see you put an incredible amount of effort into the article. If you would like to add an image to your DYK nomination, let me know and I can adjust my review accordingly. Cheers, Toreightyone (talk) 22:08, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Toreightyone, thanks for the review! It was indeed quite a process to get this to GA! Unfortunately, there are no photographs of either species available, so I don't think any images from the article would make sense with Alt0. Enwebb (talk) 23:05, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Understandable, I noticed Bismarck masked flying fox has an image however as it is an artist's rendition it probably would not be overly useful. Congrats nonetheless, Toreightyone (talk) 23:44, 7 June 2019 (UTC)