Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Stuart Smith
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 18:59, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Mary Stuart Smith
.jpg)
Mary Stuart Smith
... that in 1893 philanthropist Lewis Ginter was admonished by feminist Mary Stuart Smith (pictured) in a speech before the World’s Congress of Women in Chicago?Source: "Mr. Lewis Ginter, one of Richmond's wealthiest citizens, sent an order to New York for two watercolor drawings...and the art dealer sent him two that were executed by Miss Williams of Mr. Ginter's own city. But, you observe, the New York seal was required upon this Southern work before its value was acknowledged at home. The failure to recognize and cherish the genius of her own artists and literary workers is one of the blots on Virginia's escutcheon. May it be the happy portion of the present generation to wipe out this reproach." Smith, Mary Stuart (1893). Mary Mark Ockerbloom (ed.). The Congress of Women: The Virginia Woman Today (Speech). New York: T. Nelson and Sons.
Improved to Good Article status by Hoppyh (talk). Self-nominated at 19:19, 29 April 2020 (UTC).
Interesting life on good sources, offline sources accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. The image is licensed and illustrates her and the period well. I was a bit surprised that in a GA, a had to fix three citations, and find the works without reference. For DYK, you'll need to source them which should be easy. - I don't like the hook, sorry. If saying this particular thing, please get her name to the front. I wonder though if Mr. Ginter is interesting enough to catch our attention. A feminist admonishing someone is nothing that differentiates her from others, no? I'm open to other suggestions. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:34, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the fixes. I think the lack of reference for the works may have been a matter of not repeating the singular reference which is Willard. Let me know what needs to be specifically referenced if you would and I'll fix. I'll try an improved hook.
- ALT1:... that in 1893 feminist Mary Stuart Smith (pictured) publicly admonished the aristocracy in Virginia for its failure to recognize the talent of its native artists.
- The fixes I made were just formal things (ref = harv is now default, but one said ref = harry, - Woods was missing the year, and if you have no author or editor you have to define the ref - as for the cemetery. I was just surprised that a GA review would not catch such things.) The works section needs a reference, - or five. The ALT1 hook is better, not relying on knowledge of a single person. I added the pictured. Ping me when the references are done, please. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: Done. Hoppyh (talk) 22:25, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:31, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: Done. Hoppyh (talk) 22:25, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- The fixes I made were just formal things (ref = harv is now default, but one said ref = harry, - Woods was missing the year, and if you have no author or editor you have to define the ref - as for the cemetery. I was just surprised that a GA review would not catch such things.) The works section needs a reference, - or five. The ALT1 hook is better, not relying on knowledge of a single person. I added the pictured. Ping me when the references are done, please. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- ALT1:... that in 1893 feminist Mary Stuart Smith (pictured) publicly admonished the aristocracy in Virginia for its failure to recognize the talent of its native artists.
