Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Fenton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:08, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Mary Fenton, Kavasji Palanji Khatau

[edit]

Created by Nizil Shah (talk). Self-nominated at 13:39, 19 July 2018 (UTC).

  • reviewing. Kavasji Palanji Khatau not new enough (unbold). QPQ pending, copyvio 2%. Checking rest Whispyhistory (talk) 07:13, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
  • @Nizil Shah: Interesting article topic and worth improving, especially if can get hold of an image. Created 30 June 2018, nominated 19 July 2018, not 5X expanded.Whispyhistory (talk) 07:49, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for review. Drafts were created before but articles were moved to mainspace on 19 July and nominated. So both articles are new and ok for dyk. I can not find image from any sources so far. Will try more to find. Will look into copyvio if any. QPQ soon. Will ask for copyediting if required. Thanks. I am waiting for more inputs.-Nizil (talk)
  • General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes

QPQ: No - ?
Overall: Reviewed, some grammar editing done so please check ok with you @Nizil Shah:. Copyvio is ok. Re-bolded husband. Fulfils DYK criteria, although I think there is more to this person to add, especially after reading about the play about her (last reference). Well done. I'll tick after QPQ Whispyhistory (talk) 18:50, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

@Whispyhistory:, QPQ submitted. Can you go through Kavasji Palanji Khatau as well and correct grammatical errors, if any? I would like to have it checked as well because it is also submitted for DYK. Thank you for detailed review. Regards,-Nizil (talk) 04:44, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
sure. Can you make sure there is an inline citation directly after your hook in the Mary article?Whispyhistory (talk) 05:33, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
for both. I rephrased some. Both articles have potential for expansion. Interesting subject. dyk criteria fulfilled. Whispyhistory (talk) 07:20, 31 July 2018 (UTC)