Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Mannion v. Coors Brewing Co.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 04:28, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Mannion v. Coors Brewing Co., Catch of the Day

Moved to mainspace by Daniel Case (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 280 past nominations.

Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 26 July 2024 (UTC).

  • Daniel Case, since this is a two-article nomination, two QPQs are required, not just one (the auto-generated requirement above apparently can't handle multi-article hooks properly. Please supply a second QPQ. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
OK, fine ... maybe the nominating template needs to make this clearer? Daniel Case (talk) 02:21, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
@BlueMoonset: While I can't help but note that as I type this, the text has a clearly boldfaced "1" next to "Number of QPQs required", I will nonetheless submit that I have reviewed Upper Ivory Coast and, I hope, cleared it for takeoff to the Main Page after over two months. Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC)


General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Daniel Case: Nice work, and it's a shame that it took so long for these articles to be reviewed. I'm just waiting on the additional QPQ, as well as some clarification on the quotes. Epicgenius (talk) 22:41, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

@Epicgenius: As I noted above (it may not have been easy to see), I reviewed Upper Ivory Coast yesterday. Daniel Case (talk) 01:06, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Whoops, I missed that. However, the four lengthy quotes still seem a bit excessive. Unless they're freely licensed, could some of them be paraphrased? Epicgenius (talk) 01:11, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
@Epicgenius: OK, I trimmed down the quoting in that section. How does it look now? Daniel Case (talk) 20:51, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Looks good to me. (Earwig still highlights a bunch of stuff, but they're all either proper names, short quotes, or quotes from the decision itself.) Epicgenius (talk) 21:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)