Template:Did you know nominations/Major Road Network

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:32, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Major Road Network

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the proposed Major Road Network would comprise just 4% of England's roads but carry 43% of traffic? "This MRN accounts for 4% of England’s road mileage and 43% of all traffic"

• ALT1: ... that the proposed Major Road Network designation would comprise just 4% of England's roads but carry 43% of its traffic?
• Reviewed: to follow

Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 18:15, 5 February 2018 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: epicgenius (talk) 21:08, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

• ​This hook sounds good, but I think we should clarify that this network is not made entirely of new roads. How about this? epicgenius (talk) 21:08, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

• ALT1: ... that the proposed Major Road Network designation would comprise just 4% of England's roads but carry 43% of its traffic?

Hi epicgenius, thanks for your review. I am happy with the amended hook. I have now carried out a QPQ review at Template:Did you know nominations/Fagersta airspace surveillance tower - Dumelow (talk) 21:21, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick response. This is now good to go. epicgenius (talk) 21:23, 5 February 2018 (UTC)