Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Lythrurus ardens

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Rcsprinter123 (gossip) @ 19:12, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Lythrurus ardens

[edit]

Created by Spirit of Eagle (talk). Self nominated at 03:02, 27 July 2014 (UTC).

  • Hook cannot be used, and fact should be changed in article I'm afraid: ref says Unknown; probable bait bucket release. Will continue with review upon reply. Thanks, Matty.007 16:06, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

ALT 1: ... that baby Lythrurus ardens grow to three-fifths of their adult size within a year?

Sorry, please can you quote for me from the source, I couldn't see it but it's probably me being blind as a bat. No close paraphrasing (some unaviodable occurances of similar wording), QPQ done, article is new enough, long enough, and neutral. Thanks, Matty.007 08:50, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

I've added a new DYK hook. This one is stated with certainty within the text. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:13, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

I probably deserve a pretty massive trout about this, but the 3/5s information came from another species on the same page as the Lythrurus ardens. I've corrected everything and made a new hook. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:57, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
I wondered if I was going blind or if you were on the wrong page... With the current hook, the source says spawning occurred in association with the longear sunfish, and the nest was guarded by both species, not that they lay their eggs in the same nest necessarily. A hook based on that fact would likely work though. Thanks, Matty.007 08:21, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Will this hook work? Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:15, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Good to go relying on previous review. Thanks, Matty.007 07:57, 6 August 2014 (UTC)