Template:Did you know nominations/Louis Moe
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:25, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Louis Moe
[edit]... that Louis Moe's illustrations (sample pictured) of classical literature include a 1898 edition of Gesta Danorum, the Poetic Edda, and works by Johan Herman Wessel and Ludvig Holberg?
- ALT1: ... that Louis Moe's works include illustrations of literary classics (pictured), as well as paintings with decadent erotic motives such as naked women
(not pictured)with monsters or animals?
- ALT1: ... that Louis Moe's works include illustrations of literary classics (pictured), as well as paintings with decadent erotic motives such as naked women
- Reviewed: Nevado Tres Cruces
Created by Oceanh (talk). Self-nominated at 21:02, 3 December 2015 (UTC).
- Fine article, new and long enough, inline cited without obvious copyvio or paraphrasing issues. As for hooks, ALT1 is interesting, short enough and properly cited. Allthough funny, I would suggest removing the "not pictured" after "naked women". The main proposal could also be OK, but the grammer isn't totally correct, I believe, because illustrations are illustrations, not the editions themselves. But with ALT1 ready to go. Iselilja (talk) 23:28, 4 December 2015 (UTC)