Template:Did you know nominations/List of places of worship in Elmbridge
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 20:17, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
List of places of worship in Elmbridge, Weybridge United Reformed Church
( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that places of worship in Elmbridge, Surrey, include the "ferocious" Weybridge United Reformed Church (pictured)?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/1992 Football League Second Division play-off Final; Template:Did you know nominations/Indira Joseph Venniyoor
- Comment: Not an amazing pic at this small size, admittedly. The list was moved to mainspace today (diff); WURC was newly created today. The hook fact, from page 517 of The Buildings of England: Surrey (2nd edition; 1971; Ian Nairn and Nikolaus Pevsner), is referenced in the sixth paragraph of the "Overview of the borough and its places of worship" section of the list (current ref [49]) and the first paragraph of the "Architecture and heritage" section of the church article (current ref [12]).
Moved to mainspace by Hassocks5489 (talk). Self-nominated at 17:40, 4 January 2021 (UTC).
- Hi Hassocks5489, review follows: articles moved/created on 4 January; both articles are excellently written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources (just a note that you include Hill, Roy (2002) in your bibliography at the list article but do not cite it); I've only checked relatively few of the vast number of sources used but found no issues with overly close paraphrasing (Earwig also turns up nothing); hook fact is mentioned in both articles and I can verify it to an online copy of Pevsner; picture is freely licensed (and taken by you) but, as you say, probably not great at this scale; two QPQs have been carried out. Thanks for producing these interesting articles, they are really enjoyable to read. You have clearly you have put a lot of work into them - Dumelow (talk) 22:07, 4 January 2021 (UTC)