Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Lillie Shockney

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lillie Shockney

  • ... that Lillie Shockney is a co-founder of the Academy of Oncology Nurse & Patient Navigators?
Moved to mainspace by Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 81 past nominations.

Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 17:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC).

  • The article is long enough and new enough with no copyright violations. All of the references are reliable. The article is neutral. Both hooks are cited, but I prefer ALT1. SL93 (talk) 21:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
    • As a promoter, I also greatly prefer ALT1, but I don't quite understand the "nurse navigation" bit. What's the best way to simplify the hook Mary Mark Ockerbloom? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
      • The "nurse navigation" or "patient navigation" field is one that few people will know and hopefully people will go to the page to find out more about it. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 16:05, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
    • AirshipJungleman29, I get it now. How's this? (same references and meaning, less tachnical language) Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 01:12, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
    • ALT1a: ... that breast cancer patients became a population who frequently worked with nurse navigators after Lillie Shockney reported the impact of the program at Johns Hopkins Hospital?
      • ...I'm not sure, I think it's still a little unclear. I'll wait to see what another promoter thinks. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
  • The new hooks are both verified, and I prefer ALT1b as the shortest and more to the point. SL93 (talk) 17:48, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
  • @SL93: Someone has uploaded a photo of her, so I have added it to the infobox, the wikidata entity and the nomination template. Thanks everyone! Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 16:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
    • Thanks. I'm leaving this for another promoter to pick up, should they wish. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:01, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
      • Why do we think this photo is actually CC-BY-SA like the commons page claims? The Author is listed as "Lillie Shockney"; considering this is a photo of Lillie Shockney, and looks like a studio portrait, it's unlikely that it's a selfie, and thus the Author is incorrect. The author of a photograph is the photographer. And it's apparently downloaded from https://aonnonline.org/authors?autid=1:lillie-shockney-2, which has a highly restrictive TOS statement. RoySmith (talk) 23:08, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
        • I have removed the photo from the nomination. Issue resolved; this can now be promoted. Schwede66 05:58, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
          • I suspect that other promoters are also finding the hook difficult to parse: we are approaching the two-month old limit. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:12, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
            • They all read awkward and obtuse to me, Rjjiii (talk) 03:51, 3 July 2024 (UTC)