Template:Did you know nominations/Kosrae State Museum
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Maile66 (talk) 01:16, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Kosrae State Museum
- ... that Kosrae State Museum used virtual reality technology to inspire interest in the state's heritage from local stakeholders and members of the Kosraean diaspora? Source: Campbell, Dace A. (October 2018). "Drones, Machetes, and Virtual Reality: 21st-Century Tools for Historic Preservation". 2018 3rd Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHERITAGE) held jointly with 2018 24th International Conference on Virtual Systems Multimedia (VSMM 2018): 1–4. doi:10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2018.8810111.
- Reviewed: TBD
- Comment: Created for International Museums Day after request by @MeegsC:
Created by Lajmmoore (talk). Self-nominated at 11:10, 16 May 2021 (UTC).
New enough, long enough. Generally well-written, though a fragment-length section could use improvement. A fresh article on an interesting subject, though, so I'll say good for DYK. No copyvio from earwig (nor from my reading of the source for the hook, I'm not sure if the tool picks up papers). Hook fact is interesting, though I would take out "local stakeholders" - it's a rather vague (though accurate) term and not as interesting as trying to get the diaspora interested, for me. And being concise will make the hook more easy to digest. This isn't necessary, of course. Fact is cited in-line and source checks out, though I don't expect everyone will have access so a limited access parameter should probably be added to the cite template. @Lajmmoore: QPQ needs to be done, I'd donate one if you'd be happy to have someone else review it (but it would then need yet another person to promote it). Kingsif (talk) 15:54, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
