Template:Did you know nominations/Kosher certification agency
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 22:58, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Kosher certification agency
[edit]
... that unauthorized use of a kosher certification agency's symbol (example pictured) is a Federal crime?
Created by Yoninah (talk). Self nominated at 10:35, 20 February 2015 (UTC).
- The article is new:
- The article is long enough:
- The hook is interesting:
- The hook is referenced:
- The hook is below 200 characters:
- A google search does not reveal any copyright violation:
- The article follows most other important policies:
- QPQ:
- The article is new:
The hook makes it seem as if the unauthorized use of this certification was specifically a federal crime; actually it is just the generic protection for all trademarked logos. Besides, "federal crime" must clarify the country where that law applies (meaning, "Federal crime in the United States") Cambalachero (talk) 18:17, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. I agree that the hook is not great, and am happy to change it. It’s hard, though, to find a really catchy hook on this subject. How about:
- ALT1: ... that the five largest kosher certification agencies in the United States certify 80 percent of the kosher food sold in that country? Yoninah (talk) 18:42, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
- I like the article with ALT1. It's certainly long enough and interesting, and the ALT1 hook is referenced. Raymie (t • c) 18:38, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
ALT1 seems fine Cambalachero (talk) 14:57, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
