Template:Did you know nominations/Kontorhaus District
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:49, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Kontorhaus District
- ... that a cholera outbreak was ultimately responsible for the development of the Kontorhaus District? Source: History of the Kontorhaus District (in German)
- ALT1:... that Hamburg's Kontorhaus District is an important testimony of Brick Expressionism? Source: World Heritage Kontorhaus District - hamburg.de
Created by Kvaloya (talk). Self-nominated at 12:50, 20 July 2019 (UTC).
- Reviewing
- Article is new enough, long enough, neutral and with no copyvio showing on Earwig.
- Very well illustrated.
- Hooks are short enough, eye-catching and of general interest.
- The original hook I think is the better but it should be supported by an inline citation in English - perhaps using the same citation as ALT 1 or one of the English language citations in the linked cholera article.
- Image appears free of copyright restrictions and has rollover text. It is detail from an image which appears in the article. The complete image which appears in the article would make the point better
- Support original hook with English citation. Use original image from article. QPQ not yet done. Papamac (talk) 15:10, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- This is the nominator's first DYK submission, so a QPQ review is not required. I agree that the full Montanhof image is more impressive, and we can let a promoting editor decide which to use. I don't see why an English source is needed if the German source is online and can be checked via Google translate or the equivalent. Pinging Papamac to see whether they wish to resume the review. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:09, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Kvaloya and Iainmacintyre: There are not nearly enough inline citations; DYK rules dictate there must be at least one per paragraph. The entire "notable buildings" section is six paragraphs long and only has one reference. 97198 (talk) 08:53, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Kvaloya and 97198: Yes, point taken. As the 4 relevant references are in German I think the nominator will have to fix this. Papamac (talk) 16:11, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
- @97198: Papamac: Done I have found and added sources (most German, some English), so there are at least two citations per paragraph. Hope this is OK now. RebeccaGreen (talk) 15:48, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Kvaloya, 97198, BlueMoonset, and RebeccaGreen: I think this has sufficient citations, but some may feel that these should be at the end of the relevant paragraphs. In the circumstances I think a second opinion on the review would be appropriate. Could another editor please re-review. Papamac (talk) 10:21, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Papamac and others, perhaps I should explain that I have placed the citations after the information for which they provide a source, per WP:CITEDENSE. If the information at the end of the paragraph is not mentioned in a source I have access to, I have not placed a citation there, per WP:INTEGRITY. If anyone thinks that the citations should be at the end of the paragraphs, then someone will need to do WP:CITEBUNDLE in order to clarify which source relates to which piece of information. RebeccaGreen (talk) 10:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- I have moved citations so all paras bar one have a citation at the end. RebeccaGreen (talk) 20:18, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
- Hi Papamac and others, perhaps I should explain that I have placed the citations after the information for which they provide a source, per WP:CITEDENSE. If the information at the end of the paragraph is not mentioned in a source I have access to, I have not placed a citation there, per WP:INTEGRITY. If anyone thinks that the citations should be at the end of the paragraphs, then someone will need to do WP:CITEBUNDLE in order to clarify which source relates to which piece of information. RebeccaGreen (talk) 10:35, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Kvaloya, 97198, BlueMoonset, and RebeccaGreen: I think this has sufficient citations, but some may feel that these should be at the end of the relevant paragraphs. In the circumstances I think a second opinion on the review would be appropriate. Could another editor please re-review. Papamac (talk) 10:21, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- @RebeccaGreen: Thanks for fixing that Papamac (talk) 09:15, 31 August 2019 (UTC)