Template:Did you know nominations/Julie Erichsen
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by MeegsC (talk) 17:08, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Julie Erichsen
- ... that Julie Erichsen is the first Norwegian female gymnast to qualify for an Olympic Games since 1992? Source: International Gymnast Magazine
Created by Riley1012 (talk). Self-nominated at 00:07, 19 April 2021 (UTC).
- @Riley1012: (Q. Why do we need the word "artistic" its not in the source) Its long enough, new, and adequately sourced (refs are not required in the lede). The hook is short enough and well referenced. Sadly no picture available - I looked. (We need more wiki people at events with cameras post lockdown). Its neutral and I saw no close paraphrasing. Previously one of the Women in Red, thank you Riley1012, just that one question Victuallers (talk) 07:30, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Victuallers: Hi Victuallers, thank you so much. I put artistic in there to clarify that I am talking about artistic gymnastics, not rhythmic gymnastics. Riley1012 (talk) 17:11, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- Its your call. Obviously you are reducing the claim the was made in the sopurce and in the article... and I think that for most people classic gymnastics is what we call gymnastics ....and then there is rhythmic gymnastics. (I had to check... I thought "artistic gymnastics" sounds like the ribbon/dancey one, and it turns out it is the classic (in my mind) gymnastics). Can you change the article and hook to use what you decide. Victuallers (talk) 18:11, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, I decided to change the hook so that it matches the source and the article. Riley1012 (talk) 18:16, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- fine. Good to go. Victuallers (talk) 07:39, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, I decided to change the hook so that it matches the source and the article. Riley1012 (talk) 18:16, 20 April 2021 (UTC)