Template:Did you know nominations/Julia C. Lathrop Homes
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:48, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Julia C. Lathrop Homes
[edit]- ... that the Julia C. Lathrop Homes, one of Chicago's first public housing complexes, was designed by a "dream team" of architects and landscape architect?
Created/expanded by XHolmes (talk), Yngvadottir (talk). Nominated by Yngvadottir (talk) at 20:47, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that the Julia C. Lathrop Homes, originally developed as public housing for whites only, has become one of the most ethnically diverse housing projects in Chicago?
- ALT2 ... that residents and preservationists have fought to save the Julia C. Lathrop Homes from demolition by the Chicago Housing Authority? --Yngvadottir (talk) 20:50, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- and I have now reviewed Branch House. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:16, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
new enough, long enough, all hooks check out but there should not be any red links in the hook fact and I would not put one in the reference either.--Ishtar456 (talk) 13:47, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
- That seems a bit odd to me. I could understand if the hook fact were hard to understand otherwise (in which case I'd explain in that sentence or a neighboring sentence in any case), and I know some people regard redlinks as a bad thing anyhow (I used to think they meant an article had been deleted, but someone pointed me to WP:REDLINK), but the only applicable rule I'm aware of is that the hook itself must not have a redlink in it. And the sources seem to think all those architects were equally prominent. A couple of them worked together so our future articles may more logically be on the partnership, but since we don't have an article on that either, I kept it simple. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:12, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
