Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/John Gellibrand

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:19, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

John Gellibrand

[edit]
Studio portrait of Brigadier General Sir John Gellibrand DSO
Studio portrait of Brigadier General Sir John Gellibrand DSO
  • ... that despite topping his class at Sandhurst, John Gellibrand (pictured) found the prospects for promotion in the British Army so bleak that he resigned his commission and moved to Tasmania to grow apples?
    Source: "He decided on a military career and, after entering the Royal Military College, Sandhurst, in September 1892, gained the highest marks in the aggregate at the final examinations a year later... " [1] "Gellibrand's frustration at lack of promotion boiled over... He refered to George Ansell, six months junior to Gellibrand a a second lieutenant, but now a lieutenant colonel in the 5th Dragoon Guards" (p. 46) "sent his gardener, Mr Warlege out to Risdon to look at the apple orchard... they agreed to buy the property for ₤1,800" (p. 52) [2]

Improved to Good Article status by Hawkeye7 (talk). Self-nominated at 00:21, 12 April 2017 (UTC).

  • Made GA newly enough. Certainly long enough and within policy. Hook is interesting, but I'd wikilink Sandhurst because it's not obvious what it is for most people. It is supported by the source you include in the nomination, but in the article body the decision to become farmer wasn't linked to frustation over promotion. Could you explain that in the article? QPQ is done and the image has legitimate copyright tags. HaEr48 (talk) 23:52, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
    Linked Sandhurst. Someone was complaining about the hooks having too many wikilinks, so I didn't link it. Since then someone responded with a cricket hook lacking links that clean bowled the regulars, so we're back to square one. Added a bit linking his decision with frustration at promotion prospects. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:23, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Thanks. Good to go now. Regarding linking, I understand what you're saying. I guess we should decide case-by-case. In this case, I think most people would not know what Sandhurst is and linking would help understanding the hook, so I think it's better. HaEr48 (talk) 01:47, 16 April 2017 (UTC)