Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Johannes Bah Kuhnke

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Jolly Ω Janner 04:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Johannes Bah Kuhnke

[edit]
Johannes Bah Kuhnke
Johannes Bah Kuhnke

Created by BabbaQ (talk). Self-nominated at 21:47, 20 January 2016 (UTC).


  • The reference for his marriage is no longer valid (the link is 404). @BabbaQ: this needs fixing. I'll do a review anyway, as hopefully this is a quick fix.
Article: New enough (created 16 Jan, nominated 20 Jan), long enough (2000+ characters), is written neutrally, and has inline citations (AGF for Swedish sources; I can't read Swedish but I can use google translate).
Hook: Both are short enough and correctly formatted. 1st hook is interesting because of the juxtaposition of an actor being married to a politician, but lacks a working reference and is referenced inline. 2nd hook isn't very interesting, but is referenced.
Image: The image is just a photograph of the person in question, it doesn't add anything to the hooks; could be left off. It is free use, used in the article and is clear when small.
QPQ: Completed (with a bit of help). Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 23:59, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
OK, Thank you for the review @Gaia Octavia Agrippa:. I have fixed the issue. Take a look and let me know what you think.BabbaQ (talk) 00:02, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
That's great. Good to go for either of the hooks. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 00:07, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. But I disagree about the image. It is good if an image is used of the person especially if the original hook is used. Anyway, I leave it up to the closing user to decide. Cheers.BabbaQ (talk) 00:10, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
All I meant was that it wasn't vital to any of the hooks. It could be left off if someone wanted to add one of the hooks to the queue without the image. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 00:12, 24 January 2016 (UTC)