The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 16:52, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
5x expanded by Kosack (talk). Self-nominated at 14:19, 15 April 2018 (UTC).
Not 5x expanded but looks like it meets the article length requirement per "had its prose portion expanded at least twofold" (it's a BLG). Article was a stub before it was expanded. ♫ TheGridExe (talk) 17:55, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
@TheGridExe: The prose stood at 237 when I started the expansion and is now at 2179 which is well over 5x expansion? Kosack (talk) 19:18, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
@Kosack: Thanks for the clarification! Yeah, I was saying it did meet the expansion requirement regardless so it should be good. I do like ALT1 better than the initial hook based on the aim of DYK but that might be more of my personal preference. I see either one meeting the criteria. ♫ TheGridExe (talk) 20:00, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Overall: I do like ALT1 better than the initial hook based on the aim of DYK but that might be more of my personal preference. – TheGridExe (talk) 13:21, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Not 5x expanded but looks like it meets the article length requirement per "had its prose portion expanded at least twofold" (it's a BLG). Article was a stub before it was expanded. ♫ TheGridExe (talk) 17:55, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
♫ TheGridExe (talk) 20:00, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
@TheGridExe: you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the five main DYK criteria have been met. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 21:38, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
I do like ALT1 better than the initial hook based on the aim of DYK but that might be more of my personal preference. – TheGridExe (talk) 13:21, 2 May 2018 (UTC)