Template:Did you know nominations/Jewellery of the Berber cultures

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 09:05, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Jewellery of the Berber cultures

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

North African amulet in the shape of a hand

• ... that in the jewellery of the Berber cultures, a silver amulet of a hand (pictured) was believed both by Muslims as well as Jewish people to protect against the Evil eye? Source: "Mais le plus sûr moyen de se protéger contre le mauvais œil est de porter en permanence des bijoux épousant la forme d’une main." (H. Camps-Fabrer, )
  • ALT1: ... that the jewellery of the Berber cultures in North Africa was appreciated for its protective effect (baraka)? Source: "Mais le plus sûr moyen de se protéger contre le mauvais œil est de porter en permanence des bijoux épousant la forme d’une main." (H. Camps-Fabrer, )
  • ALT2: ... that Jewish silversmiths had been producing jewellery of the Berber cultures for hundreds of years? Source: Rabaté, Marie-Rose; André Goldenberg; Jean-Louis Thau (1999). Bijoux du Maroc du Haut Atlas à la Méditerranée, depuis le temps des juifs jusqu'à la fin du XXe siècle (in French). Aix-en-Provence: Edisud/Eddif. pp. 182-189

Created by Munfarid1 (talk). Self-nominated at 07:30, 7 January 2022 (UTC).

Interesting article, on fine sources, offline sources accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. I am not happy with piping the article title, - can you word one (or all) using the title as it is? I think the original is the most interesting one. - In the article, we need a few more refs, - no end of a paragraph without please. It would be better - but no need - if refs for one fact were in ascending numerical order. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:01, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Gerda, for your valuable comments. I have just changed the links to the original title and hope you will find one of the hooks suitable. Also, I have added some more references as suggested, but refs for one fact are automatically given in a different order, when one ref is used more than once. - As far as I know, there is nothing I can do about this...Munfarid1 (talk) 16:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

thank you! I like the original so much better than the others, that I leave only that one. You can change the ref order, but it's nothing serious. When you go to GA, you better change ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:11, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

@Mujinga and Gerda Arendt: quite a few paragraphs newly added seem to lack end-of-paragraph-sourcing; Scholarship and publications about Berber jewellery, paragraph 2; Early ethnographic descriptions, paragraph 2; and the final blockquote (unless it's cited right before). Could this be cleared up before I promote? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 10:34, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

@Mujinga:: I still see few un-cited paragraphs. Can you look into it. Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:27, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

@Theleekycauldron: Sorry, I did not see this until today and have just added sources to all statements. And yes, the final blockquote is cited right before. So I think you can go ahead and promote it.Munfarid1 (talk) 12:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

@Mujinga: The following statement needs a citation: "and Brooklyn Museum in New York City, also present such pieces and other traditional cultural objects of the Berber people." Z1720 (talk) 17:47, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Two new refs for Brooklyn Museum added, one for jewellery and one for carpets (other trad. cultural objects). Munfarid1 (talk) 22:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

LOL, can people please stop confusing me with Munfarid1 on this thread, I have nothing to do with it and I've been pinged three times now. Thanks and happy editing. Mujinga (talk) 09:25, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

ALT0 to T:DYK/P5

References