Template:Did you know nominations/Javan frogmouth

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by feminist (talk) 14:50, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Javan frogmouth

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the Javan frogmouth may be more common than is generally thought? Source: "Generally considered uncommon throughout this range, and the population on Java is particularly scarce ... but it is likely to be under-recorded throughout [its range]."

• Reviewed: James Raymond Lawson

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 19:20, 29 December 2017 (UTC).

• Date, length, age, and everything else checks out. I just have a quick question about the hook: Would it read better to say "may be more common than generally thought"? Is the "is" entirely necessary? I apologize if this is super obvious. Aoba47 (talk) 22:05, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

• @Aoba47: I'm fine without the "is" and have struck it in the hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:35, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you for addressing this; everything looks good to me. Aoba47 (talk) 15:31, 30 December 2017 (UTC)