Template:Did you know nominations/Janine Brodie
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by --- Coffeeandcrumbs 03:01, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Janine Brodie
[edit]- ... that in 1985, Janine Brodie's book Women and Politics in Canada was the first to explore Canadian women in politics from 1945 to 1975? Source: Cook, Stephen (29 December 2017). "Three Edmontonians receive Order of Canada". Edmonton Journal. Retrieved 8 June 2019.
- ALT1:... that political scientist Janine Brodie was named a Member of the Order of Canada for her research in Canadian politics, public policy, social governance, and gender politics? Source: "DR. JANINE BRODIE, C.M." The Governor General of Canada. 2018. Retrieved 8 June 2019.
- ALT2:... that Royal Society of Canada fellow Janine Brodie only decided to pursue political science as a career after prompting from her professor? Source: "Janine Brodie". Carleton University. 8 November 2016. Retrieved 8 June 2019.
Created by HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk). Self-nominated at 00:14, 6 June 2019 (UTC).
this is the first DYK review I have done and I'm following the review guide very closely – please bear with me- readable prose size is 4050 B (653 words) and article was created on 6 June 2019 – okay so far
- article is well sourced and I think it could potentially be nominated for GA – it is not a stub
- all three hooks are authentic with valid sourcing
- article has inline citations throughout and has appropriate source listing sections with no externals; all urls are fully cited (no bare urls)
- all three have acceptable length <200 characters and there is no evidence of copyright violation
- all hooks are interesting but I think the primary most so as it surprised me
- QPQ done so this is okay to go – well done. No Great Shaker (talk) 11:01, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
- @No Great Shaker: QPQ done. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 17:12, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
