Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Irving Gottesman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Orlady (talk) 04:01, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Irving Gottesman

[edit]

Created/expanded by Guillaume2303 (talk) (created), Churn and change (talk) (expanded). Nominated by Guillaume2303 (talk) at 16:08, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Is it “he was“ or “he is“... the article and the citation says “he is“, and in the article so many terms disambiguated to pages which are not there, needs to be removed. First clear these two points.

 MehrajMir ' (Talk) 12:49, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

      • I've changed the hook as requested. I've also gone through the article, but didn't find any links to disambiguation pages. There are some redlinks, but they all seem to be likely subjects for articles yet to be created, so I'm not sure what you mean with your second point. Could you perhaps expand on that? Thanks! --Guillaume2303 (talk) 13:30, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
Hook ok checked within the article, prose expanded to the required length, article well cited, no copyvio found.

I was mentioning those redlinks so many, as they are subjects, I think it‘s good to go.  MehrajMir ' (Talk) 13:54, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

The redlinks are for articles which probably should be created, since they look notable. If you disagree with their notability, please free to either edit, or discuss it here. Churn and change (talk) 16:33, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
It's good to go, so this issue is moot now, and in any case, this is not the place to dsiscuss that, but the article talk page. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 20:55, 10 August 2012 (UTC)