Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Intergroup relations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:10, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

Intergroup relations

[edit]

5x expanded by Peter.h.fisher (talk). Self-nominated at 06:43, 3 December 2018 (UTC).


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: None required.

Overall: Peter.h.fisher, great work on this article, just a few issues to fix. Catrìona (talk) 08:24, 12 December 2018 (UTC) Preserving discussion moved from template to avoid errors:

Please fix close paraphrasing with this pdf
  • @Catrìona: After reviewing the linked pdf, it seems to be a jumble of words and phrases related to intergroup relations possibly assembled by a bot. It is possible the close paraphrasing is a result of a web bot using language from the intergroup relations wikipedia page to populate that pdf. Since the pdf is nonsensical and does not seem to have been written by a human, I'm going to leave the section as is. Peter.h.fisher (talk)
There are a few statements missing a citation:
  • These students include Anthony Greenwald, Stanley Milgram, and Thomas Pettigrew.
  • Muzafer Sherif's research on the psychology of group conflict was informed by his experiences observing and studying discrimination and social pressures in the United States and in Turkey.

I am not sure that the hook is interesting. Could you maybe give a more specific, vivid example?

Some of these may be alright, although borderline. I will let the promoter decide. Catrìona (talk) 04:30, 17 December 2018 (UTC)