The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: An interesting hook, everything else covered. Good to go. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:29, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Eddie891. You have, I believe, nominated at least 4 previous DYKs, and so your review of another nomination is required as QPQ. Also, in the article's "Further reading" the link to the source pdf (The inspectors general of the United States Army, 1777-1903) is broken; could you fix it? Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:29, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
@Eddie891: QPQ; apologies, I was misled by the four DYK credits at the top of your user page. You still have your review in the bank for your next nomination. Link - thanks; a fascinating book, and a very good article - heading for ACR I assume? Nom now approved. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:29, 1 September 2018 (UTC)