Template:Did you know nominations/In Re Electronic Privacy Information Center
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Montanabw(talk) 03:48, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
In Re Electronic Privacy Information Center
[edit]- ... that the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a petition to halt the National Security Agency's phone record collection program in In Re Electronic Privacy Information Center?
Created by Scrootlaw (talk). Nominated by Morninj (talk) at 16:50, 7 March 2014 (UTC).
Long enough and new enough, and no QPQ needed, but article needs a fair amount of cleanup before the nomination can be considered for DYK. Issues include the "citation needed" templates sprinkled in the article, bare-url reference citations, and the inappropriate use of other Wikipedia articles as footnoted reference citations. See Wikipedia:Did you know/Supplementary guidelines, items D2, D3, and D4, and WP:RS#Primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. After seeing these issues, I have not done any additional review yet. --Orlady (talk) 03:41, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
There has been no response from nominator or creator despite talk-page pings; indeed, the creator hasn't edited since March 6, and the nominator has only made a single edit, on April 4, since March 20. Under the circumstances, I think we have to consider this nomination abandoned, and given the issues already found with it, it's time to close it as unsuccessful. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:25, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
