Template:Did you know nominations/Imprinted brain hypothesis
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:59, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Imprinted brain hypothesis
- ... that the proposers of the imprinted brain hypothesis, which claims autistic and schizotypal traits are opposites, had no background in behavioural genetics before proposing it? Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/11/health/research/11brain.html "The two researchers — Bernard Crespi, a biologist at Simon Fraser University in Canada, and Christopher Badcock, a sociologist at the London School of Economics, who are both outsiders to the field of behavior genetics — have spelled out their theory in a series of recent journal articles."
- Reviewed: Michael van der Veen
Improved to Good Article status by Vaticidalprophet (talk). Self-nominated at 12:38, 16 February 2021 (UTC).
Newness requirement satisfied by GNG promotion on 2/16. Article is also long enough, well written, and appropriately sourced. Earwig detects no issues. Impressive work. Hook is interesting, short enough, and supported by in-line citation. GNG requirement has also been met. Cbl62 (talk) 16:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
