Template:Did you know nominations/IWRG Guerra de Campeones
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Montanabw(talk) 21:49, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
IWRG Guerra de Campeones
[edit]- ...that the Guerra de Campeones professional wrestling show saw championships from four different promotions being defended?
- Reviewed: K-25
5x expanded by MPJ-DK (talk). Self-nominated at 15:41, 4 July 2016 (UTC).
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article has been expanded from 1030 chars to 6588 chars since 16:01, 28 May 2016 (UTC), a 6.40-fold expansion
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 6588 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely (2.0% confidence; confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
Some overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 117 characters
- ✗ MPJ-DK has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review is required for this nomination.
- ✗ Template:Did you know nominations/K-25 appears to have been used as QPQ for Template:Did you know nominations/70 IWRG DYKs, Template:Did you know nominations/IWRG Guerra de Campeones
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 23:48, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note to reviewer I had originally submitted this as part of a 70-DYK submission. After a comunity discussion it was agreed it would be better to withdraw that one and put up smaller hooks. The QPQ was originally listed on the 70-DYK page but since it never went to the main page it was never "spent" if you will. MPJ-DK 23:55, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- I don't trust that bloody automated review as far as I can throw it. I agree that the QPQ is unspent.
New enough, long enough. Hook short enough and sourced (as is every paragraph). No neutrality problems found, no copyright problems found, no maintenance templates found. QPQ done and image properly licensed. Good to go.--Launchballer 13:11, 2 August 2016 (UTC)--Launchballer 13:11, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
