Template:Did you know nominations/IWGP Heavyweight Championship (IGF)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 13:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

IWGP Heavyweight Championship (IGF)

(

)

...that on February 17, 2008, Inoki Genome Federation's IWGP Heavyweight Championship was unified with New Japan Pro Wrestling's IWGP Heavyweight Championship.

ALT1:...that Brock Lesnar was stripped of the IWGP Heavyweight Championship by New Japan Pro Wrestling but Inoki Genome Federation continued to recognize him as the IWGP Heavyweight Champion.
Reviewed: Philip Baxter

Created by Wrestlinglover (talk). Self-nominated at 12:31, 13 September 2015 (UTC).

new enough, long enough, inline citations and refs checks, interesting and factual hook. Good 2 go.BabbaQ (talk) 12:23, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

BabbaQ, I don't see any mention that you checked for close paraphrasing or neutrality, the other "within policy" checks. Can you please do so to complete the review? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:35, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Since BabbaQ never completed the review, need a new reviewer to check the close paraphrasing and neutrality criteria. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:16, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Passes DYK date/length rules and meets policy requirements. Coverage of dispute is neutral, portraying both federation's perspective accurately and individual claims as precisely that. Good to go. SFB 19:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I came by to promote this, but could not find an inline cite for the ALT1 hook fact (the part about Inoki continuing to recognize him). Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 01:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

@Yoninah: See ref 2, discusses the whole situation at hand.--WillC 02:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Per Eligibility criteria (#3. Cited hook), the hook fact must be followed directly by an inline cite. Before you put one there, though, is 411 Mania a reliable source? It looks like a blog. Yoninah (talk) 02:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Moved to the previous sentence, really that was reaching. Yes, it is reliable. Been used in FLs and GAs.--WillC 05:41, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

OK, thanks. ALT1 hook ref verified and cited inline. Rest of review per Sillyfolkboy. Yoninah (talk) 13:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)