Template:Did you know nominations/Hinged arch bridge

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 00:28, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Hinged arch bridge

(

)

Hinge on Sydney Harbour Bridge

... that hinges on arch bridges (example pictured) were introduced in 1858 and remain popular in modern civil engineering? "invention of the two-hinged arch: an important step forward in terms of construction and technology was reached by the engineers Couche and Salle. 1858 their wrought iron railwai bridge over the channel of St. Denis" from: Sinopoli, A. (18 December 2020). Arch Bridges. CRC Press. p. 71. ISBN 978-1-000-15092-6. and "three-hinged arches: the arches are widely used in modern engineering" from: Karnovsky, Igor A.; Lebed, Olga (14 March 2010). Advanced Methods of Structural Analysis. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 77. ISBN 978-1-4419-1047-9.
- ALT1:... that because parts were built to two different designs the 1888 Hennepin Avenue Bridge was classed as both a two- and three-hinged bridge? "Because it was built in two unique longitudinal halves by two different bridge companies , the bridge has historic engineering as well transportation significance . The earlier - constructed north arch ribs are three- hinged . The south ribs were added as two- hinged arches , making the bridge both a two- and three- hinged arch." from: Hennepin Ave Mississippi River Bridge Replacement, Minneapolis: Environmental Impact Statement. 1986. p. 106.

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Anne Makemie Holden

Created/expanded by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 15:57, 22 October 2021 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Overall, this dyk satisfies all requirements, including those for image use, and I would say it is good to go. I would definitely choose the main hook over the alt. JJonahJackalope (talk) 20:39, 22 October 2021 (UTC) To T:DYK/P7