Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Heteromysis actiniae, Bartholomea annulata, Ancylomenes pedersoni, Spotted cleaner shrimp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 20:12, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Heteromysis actiniae, Bartholomea annulata, Ancylomenes pedersoni, Spotted cleaner shrimp

[edit]

Created/expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self nom at 12:36, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

  • I will review this shortly. Chris857 (talk) 01:03, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Review
  • All articles cite sources inline
  • Image copyrights look good
  • QPQ satisfied
  • Hook is brief and referenced for articles for which I can access the source


Ancylomenes pedersoni
  • Expanded 346 chars to 1817 (5.2x)
  • I detect no copyvio
  • [1] doesn't work, but its DOI does.
  • Is Bartholomea annulator the same as Bartholomea annulata? Chris857 (talk) 01:58, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Spotted cleaner shrimp
  • Expanded 368 chars to 1598 (4.3x) - This needs to be dealt with
  • Expanded enough
  • I detect no copyvio
  • "First report of Periclimenes yucatanicus (Ives)..." appears twice as slightly different refs; please combine. Chris857 (talk) 01:58, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Heteromysis actiniae
  • New, about about 1700 chars
  • I detect no copyvio Chris857 (talk) 01:58, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Bartholomea annulata
  • New, about 2900 chars
  • I detect no copyvio Chris857 (talk) 01:58, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

_______________________________

I have further expanded the Spotted cleaner shrimp article. I'm not sure about the number of characters, but it has been expanded from 56 words to 321. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:48, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
The expansion was sufficient. Chris857 (talk) 13:17, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
I have gone through the articles, and have listed some issues above. Chris857 (talk) 01:58, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
I have dealt with the issues mentioned above. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:08, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Alright, AGF on offline sources, this passes. Chris857 (talk) 19:39, 19 September 2012 (UTC)