Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Galidor: Defenders of the Outer Dimension

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 11:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Galidor: Defenders of the Outer Dimension

ALT 1

Improved to Good Article status by ProtoDrake (talk). Nominated at 01:03, 6 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Galidor: Defenders of the Outer Dimension; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

As the person who wrote this article, could you provide the quote/timestamp to support this? I couldn't find that information specifically anywhere. --ProtoDrake (talk) 07:32, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

@ProtoDrake:"During the late 1990s to early 2000s, Danish toy company The Lego Group were suffering from falling profits; while licenses for franchises such as Star Wars and the in-house Bionicle line proved profitable, at the time there was a market shift away from the style of brick building toys the Lego Group had designed up to that point. Intending to break into the action figure market, the Lego Group created a concept of figures with interchangeable limbs and an associated storyline. The intent was giving buyers both design freedom with the sets and an entertaining narrative."--Gus1001 (talk) 15:55, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
@Gus1001: that doesn't seem to support the notion that the tv show got its idea of shapeshifting limbs from the toy line. theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/her) 18:20, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
@Theleekycauldron: Agreed. It's also not from any of the actual creative staff who were interviewed. It's a quote from the podcast hosts, not the same and in this case I think not admissable. --ProtoDrake (talk) 22:47, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
@ProtoDrake: Maybe you could write another alternate DYK for this article.--Gus1001 (talk) 00:09, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
I don't really know DYK procedures, but noting the nominator is now blocked as checkuser confirmed LTA sock. -- ferret (talk) 00:59, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
  • ProtoDrake, would you like to pursue this DYK nomination for this article? If so, please provide a new hook. Otherwise, as Gus1001 has been blocked as a sock, the nomination should be closed if you're not interested in taking over. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:15, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
    • @BlueMoonset: No, I have no interest in pursuing this nom. --ProtoDrake (talk) 06:45, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
      • Nominator has been blocked as a sock, and person who shepherded the article through the GA process has no interest in pursuing the nomination. Marking for closure. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:26, 13 July 2023 (UTC)