Template:Did you know nominations/Fresno kangaroo rat
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:21, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Fresno kangaroo rat, San Quintin kangaroo rat
[edit]( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that while the Fresno kangaroo rat is considered "vulnerable", the San Quintin kangaroo rat may already be extinct?
- Reviewed: I.O.O.F. Centennial Building
- Comment: Also reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/PSLV-C34
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 11:27, 9 July 2016 (UTC).
- Review of Fresno kangaroo rat
No issues found with article, ready for human review.
- ✓ This article has been expanded from 364 chars to 3635 chars since 00:30, 16 August 2015 (UTC), a 9.99-fold expansion
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 3635 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ✓ The probability of copyright violation is 9.9%. (confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
- Review of San Quintin kangaroo rat
Some issues found.
- ✗ This article was not created or 5x expanded within the past 7 days. This article has been expanded from 520 characters to 1910 chars of readable prose since 07:55, 27 April 2016 (UTC), a 3.67-fold expansion, 690 short of a 5x expansion.
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 1910 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ✓ The probability of copyright violation is 1.0%. (confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
- General comments
- No overall issues detected
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length for 2 nominations at 108 characters (65 after subtracting extra links)
- ✓ Cwmhiraeth has more than 5 DYK credits. 2 QPQ reviews of Template:Did you know nominations/PSLV-C34,Template:Did you know nominations/I.O.O.F. Centennial Building were performed for this nomination.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 22:40, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- Well done Bot! I have now further expanded the second article and it should be plenty long enough at 3051 characters. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:29, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
New enough, (now) long enough, adequately sourced, with the hook claims properly sourced. Interesting-enough hook, within length bounds (especially for the double nomination). QPQ done. No copyvio found. Good to go. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
