Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/French submarine Fulton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:33, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

French submarine Fulton

[edit]
Fulton
Fulton

Created by L293D (talk). Self-nominated at 12:38, 3 November 2018 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Good, well-constructed article that reads well and is packed with data. I look forward to reading more about its operational history in due course. I'm taking the references in good faith. If I'm honest, the hook citation doesn't actually say the French named the sub after Fulton, although that seems highly likely. If we can't find a more specific hook I'd go with ALT1 as it is slightly looser. In addition, I have a couple of questions. First, in talking about the refit ("Service" section) what do "at the kiosk" and "at Headquarters" mean? Second, in terms of its fate, is "stricken" a nautical term? I've not come across it before. Does it mean "scrapped"? Bermicourt (talk) 17:43, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

  • The periscope thing was a google translate error that I hadn't removed. Yes, "stricken" is a nautical term; it essentially means decommissioned. L293D ( • ) 20:46, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks, I'm content that this is good to go. Bermicourt (talk) 21:16, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
  • The article has been altered since this review was done and the hook will need to be changed to match the article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:39, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
    • @Cwmhiraeth: if the problem was that the hook fact was no longer present in the article, that's fixed now. L293D ( • ) 13:56, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
@L293D: The basic problem is that the article mentions Fulton invented the "first practical submarine" but does not mention a steamboat, while the hook mentions a steamboat but not the submarine. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:15, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
this source said that Fulton invented the steamboat, but other sources disagree. Therefore, I'm proposing an other alt:
  • Restoring tick now that article and hook match up. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:33, 5 December 2018 (UTC)