Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Foucauldian discourse analysis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 18:07, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Foucauldian discourse analysis

[edit]

Created/expanded by Piotrus (talk). Self nom at 23:02, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

  • The article is new and long enough (2069 characters). It is neutral and cites sources. Only one source used in the article is available online but I AGF in case of copyright. The hook is not to long (141 character). It is interesting, cited (AGF for sources) and neutral. The nominator has reviewed another nomination. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 08:22, 23 February 2012 (UTC)