Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Federico Döring

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:32, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Federico Döring

[edit]
  • Reviewed: That's In Queensland
  • Comment: There were no inline citations or references on this article prior to being edited, thus I'm considering it a BLP expansion (2x)

2x expanded and sourced (BLP) by Raymie (talk). Self-nominated at 20:08, 6 July 2016 (UTC).

  • No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • This biographical article has been expanded from 897 chars to 3553 chars since 01:00, 14 June 2016 (UTC), a 3.96-fold expansion
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 3553 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • The probability of copyright violation is 1.0%. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • No overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 01:29, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

  • This article is a twofold expansion of an unsourced living-person biography. It is new enough and long enough. The article is neutral but the Spanish language sources prevented me from considering copyright issues. The article on the Videoscandals states that the tape showed the passing of US$1,450,000 in cash, while this article just states US$45,000. Please could you make the two articles consistent? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:28, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
  • @Cwmhiraeth: I've found one from the time period (2004). Raymie (tc) 05:41, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
  • I was concerned that readers might click through to the Videoscandals article (unsourced) and find that the sum involved was different, but I have now changed the sum of money in that article to agree with this one and added your two citations. Good to go. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Raymie (tc) 20:47, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Review needed of new ALT1 hook. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:38, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Not quite so hooky as the original hook, but ALT1 is acceptable from a DYK perspective. Good to go. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:34, 12 August 2016 (UTC)