Template:Did you know nominations/FactCheckArmenia.com
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:28, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
FactCheckArmenia.com
- ... that FactCheckArmenia.com falsely claimed that "No Armenians were harmed" during the deportation of Armenian intellectuals on 24 April 1915? Source: https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2017/these-fake-fact-checkers-are-peddling-lies-about-genocide-and-censorship-in-turkey/
Created by Buidhe (talk). Self-nominated at 11:39, 20 November 2020 (UTC).
: hook fact is interesting, verified. Article is neutral, referenced to reliable sources, free of copyvio, new and long enough. I've checked some of the references, and they line up. QPQ is fine. LGTM, nice work! Eddie891 Talk Work 22:59, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I came by to promote this, but the article seems terribly one-sided. Often we have to encourage editors to look for something bad to say about a subject, but here I wonder if there's anything good to say to balance out the presentation? Otherwise it seems sort of a public-service announcement to stay away from this organization. Yoninah (talk) 22:19, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- There are some things that I'd say there really aren't two sides to and in looking at the sourcing it seems like this is one of them. All reliable gsearch results are controversies about the organisation engaging genocide denial and the like. I'll of course wait to hear buidhe's thoughts, but I really couldn't see a way to present the organisation in a better light than the article does (which is to say, there isn't much good to say). Eddie891 Talk Work 22:27, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- (ec) Well, that's the issue. I literally couldn't find any reliable sources that portray this website positively. I just went through Google results and added a couple of books, but both didn't have any praise for the website. (t · c) buidhe 22:56, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
