The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 14:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Full review needed. No QPQ appears to be necessary; I could only find two previous DYK credits, one of which was nominated by someone else and therefore doesn't count. Coffee, did you find five previous DYK nominations by this user, and if so could you please point them out? Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:25, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
I somehow in my head thought it was after 1 DYK... you are indeed correct. As such here we go:
@Coffee: this article was created on March 20 and nominated two weeks later. I don't see a 5x expansion before April 4. Are you accepting this despite the lateness of the nomination? Yoninah (talk) 19:46, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
@Yoninah: I'm invoking WP:IAR and saying yes. I forgot to mention that above, but I see no good reason to hold anything against someone for coming in just 4 days past the window. I think it's best for this environment to be as inclusive as it can be, I hope you agree as well here. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 05:08, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
@Coffee: yes, I'm fine with it. I was just going through the checklist in preparation for hook promotion, and wondered if you noticed that. Restoring your tick. Yoninah (talk) 13:58, 14 April 2017 (UTC)