Template:Did you know nominations/Epsom General Hospital
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Rcsprinter (cackle) @ 09:58, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Epsom General Hospital
[edit]- ... that Epsom General Hospital has its own radio station, "Epsom Hospital Radio", which is a registered charity and is staffed by volunteers?
- Comment: Epsom Hospital Radio did exist but I redirected it per WP:TNT; the content there was pure trite.
Moved to mainspace by Launchballer (talk), Ritchie333 (talk). Nominated by Launchballer (talk) at 23:54, 1 November 2013 (UTC).
Per the list provided by User:Allen3 here, I stopped by to check for compliance with Wikipedia's sourcing guidelines for medical text. This article is about an institution, and I don't see anything in the proposed hooks that engages MEDRS, nor did I see anything problematic wrt MEDRS only in the article; I will leave source verification, copyvio checking, etc to other DYK reviewers, and mention that a copyedit is needed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:32, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Normal full DYK review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
As far as I can see, the nominator has more than 5 DYKs and needs to do a QPQ review. Otherwise this article meets DYK criteria. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:31, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- I'll get on to that immediately, but QPQ checker thinks I've only done one?--Launchballer 19:20, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Launchballer, QPQchecker is not the be-all and end-all; it's known to miss past DYK contributions, and with toolserver becoming less reliable, it's missing more and more legitimate past DYKs. If it shows five or more, then it's clear that a QPQ is owed; if it shows fewer, then a manual check of the nominator's talk page and archives is in order. You always have to submit QPQs for self-nominations now. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:44, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
With the QPQ out of the way, this is now ready to go. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:17, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
