The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 08:36, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Taking this one. Review will follow. SusunW (talk) 18:41, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
Created on July 12, nom on July 14 - new enough; 2523 char - long enough; neutral; cited; no photo; QPQ done. Hook at 88 char is under the maximum; interesting, and neutral. Almost 50% of text is noted in Earwig as being close to the source Pennsylvania Heritage. Reviewing the findings, the article needs a copyedit as close paraphrasing is more than just titles and the one lengthy quote. If you are going to say she is "arguably" IMO, you need to specify who is making that argument. Please ping me when copyedit has rectified the noted issues. SusunW (talk) 18:57, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
I left another note on Topshelver's talk page. If there is no comment in the next few days I suggest closing this as rejected. Z1720 (talk) 00:55, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Thanks Z1720 for notifying Topshelver again. I don't think closing the article is a solution, as we all now know there is close paraphrasing. I'll work on it and try to eliminate that issue, but what I don't know is whether I can approve it still if I fix that problem. SusunW (talk) 14:42, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
@SusunW: If it is minor changes then I think you can still approve, but if you are doing some major rewrites or restructuring then this will probably need a new reviewer. When in doubt, get a new reviewer. Once this is ready, you can approve it or mark it with a red "DYK?again" arrow so that a new reviewer will look at it. Z1720 (talk) 14:47, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Okay, I've restructured and edited it. Should only have names and the one long quote in Earwig. SusunW (talk) 16:06, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Needs a new reviewer, I think, based on above conversation. SusunW (talk) 16:06, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi folks, apologies for the belated response - I sidetracked myself into other projects. SusunW, thanks for cleaning up the article - it looks great. Topshelver (talk) 15:59, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
_telegrapher_West_Chester_Pennsylvania.jpg)
Created on July 12, nom on July 14 - new enough; 2523 char - long enough; neutral; cited; no photo; QPQ done. Hook at 88 char is under the maximum; interesting, and neutral. Almost 50% of text is noted in Earwig as being close to the source Pennsylvania Heritage. Reviewing the findings, the article needs a copyedit as close paraphrasing is more than just titles and the one lengthy quote. If you are going to say she is "arguably" IMO, you need to specify who is making that argument. Please ping me when copyedit has rectified the noted issues. SusunW (talk) 18:57, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
--evrik (talk) 03:12, 8 August 2022 (UTC)