Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/El Amor (Ricardo Arjona song)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 16:38, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

El Amor (Ricardo Arjona song)

[edit]

Created/expanded by Hahc21 (talk). Self nom at 04:45, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

  • QPQ done. Hook properly formatted. Media has acceptable copyright tags. No plagiarism concerns.
  • "Article has not been created or expanded 5x within the past 10 days (268 days) DYKcheck does not account for previous versions with splits or copyright violations." --LauraHale (talk) 05:58, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Further expansion required. --LauraHale (talk) 05:58, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Hey. The article was 320 words in 13 June and i expanded it to 1375 words.. Isn't that 5x expansion? I have no further info to add, i think. Let me see. :( —Hahc21 12:54, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
1904 B (320 words) "readable prose size" was start size. Current size is Prose size (text only): 8118 B (1375 words) "readable prose size". Fize fold expansion is 1600. DYK tool check is your friend for helping to know if an article is good to go. :) If you're going to be a regular (woot woot. do QPs, more than needed. love for doing this right and more than you need. We need about 7 more reviews done for QPQ a day than nominations in order to keep up.) User:Shubinator/DYKcheck tells you about teh easy to use tool. --LauraHale (talk) 00:17, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Haha i already used the tool. I just made a mistake when counting how many words i needed. Let me see if I can expand it more. Cheers! —Hahc21 01:49, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Oh, Laura. I think i will withdraw this. It cannot be expanded with more info. I added some additional but only got roughly 1500. Another 100 words will be impossible. There's nothing else i may add to it, sadly.Hahc21 02:56, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Expanded to 1602 words and will add more. Hope this is ready now. Cheers! —Hahc21 02:55, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


manual check says 320 * 5 = 1,600 words. Article length = 1,603. Hooked fact supported by article text and source. Good to go. --LauraHale (talk) 03:10, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Great! Thanks :) —Hahc21 03:26, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Oh, and actually, This one: [1] is the source covering the hooked fact. i have made a minor fix for it. —Hahc21 03:28, 12 July 2012 (UTC)