Template:Did you know nominations/Edward McClaren
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:04, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Edward McClaren
- ... that Edward McClaren was one of only three black doctors in Greenville, South Carolina in 1950? [1]
- ALT1:... that there were only three black doctors in legally segregated Greenville, SC in 1950?
Created by Mr Ernie (talk). Self-nominated at 18:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC).
References
- ^ Atkinson, Macon. "Black people needed a hospital in Greenville during Jim Crow, so this doctor built his own". Greenville News. Retrieved 18 February 2021.
Mr Ernie I'd love to see this subject on the main page, but the prose size is only 990 characters, DYK requires a minimum of 1500. The hook is also not cited in the article - I appreciate that it's all from the one source, but the sentence needs to be directly cited. I just checked on Google, and found some more mentions of the subject from the Greenville News (eg this) - would you be willing to expand the article a bit and add some more citations? GirthSummit (blether) 11:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Girth Summit thanks for the help! I will add prose and additional sources to the article this weekend. I couldn't believe the story myself when I first heard about it, and I think sharing it with the readers of the project would be a great way to link content with Black History Month. Mr Ernie (talk) 22:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Cool - feel free to ping me when you're done and I'll re-review it. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 13:06, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- Girth Summit just checking back in with you. I've expanded the text of the article and added additional sources. Would you mind taking another look and seeing if this is something worthy of DYK? Thanks again! Mr Ernie (talk) 21:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Mr Ernie this is almost there, there are still a couple of unsourced assertions though (unreferenced sentences at the ends of paragraphs 1, 2 and 4, and paragraph 5 is completely unsourced. I imagine this all comes from the existing refs - would you mind just adding a few more citations to those refs to make it clear where each bit of information is coming from? If you're not sure how to use 'ref name', just add the whole citation and I'll be happy to tidy it up. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 13:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Bother. Re-ping Mr Ernie GirthSummit (blether) 13:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Girth Summit I've had a go at adding additional cites and attempted to learn how to use ref name. I hope I didn't make a mess of it! Mr Ernie (talk) 02:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Much improved, I think this is now good to go. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 18:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)- (Just to confirm: new enough, long enough after expansion, well-cited throughout to respectable sources which support the hook, which is itself sourced within the article. Free of copyvio as far as I can detect, no images to worry about licenses for. GirthSummit (blether) 18:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC))
- Girth Summit I've had a go at adding additional cites and attempted to learn how to use ref name. I hope I didn't make a mess of it! Mr Ernie (talk) 02:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
