Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Douglas W. Owsley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 13:10, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Douglas W. Owsley

[edit]

Douglas W. Owsley, 2006

Created/expanded by Cindamuse (talk). Self nom at 07:31, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

  • This is my first DYK nomination and as such, I would appreciate all input and any ideas about the hook. Thanks.
  • Fascinating article. I see that it's up for GA, as well it should be. The hook comes out at 203 characters by my count, and the repetition of "over x-thousand" seems a bit klunky. I think this is one of those counterintuitive cases where less information actually has more impact, and would suggest shortening the hook to:
ALT1 ... that Douglas W. Owsley (pictured) of the Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of Natural History has overseen the forensic examination of over 10,000 human remains?
or even:
ALT2 ... that Douglas W. Owsley (pictured) of the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History has overseen the forensic examination of over 10,000 human remains?
Length, sources, history, and references all check out. Hook citations accepted in good faith. Really good reading, thank you. - PKM (talk) 03:29, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
  • The characters went over when someone added (pictured). That said, I like both alternate versions better. Either one works for me. I'm welcome to leave it to your discretion. Thanks for the feedback! Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 03:50, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
We usually don't count "(pictured)". --PFHLai (talk) 13:10, 19 February 2012 (UTC)