Template:Did you know nominations/Diocese of Banias
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 22:49, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Diocese of Banias, Adam of Acre, John (bishop of Banyas)
( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that Adam and John were the only Latin bishops of Banias who lived in Banias?
- Source: Hamilton, p. 120
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Aquilegia gracillima, Template:Did you know nominations/Jama Masjid, Hyderabad
Surtsicna (talk) 16:52, 5 January 2025 (UTC).
@Surtsicna: I need a third QPQ (there are two). I'm also having trouble finding the passage in Hamilton that verifies this from your link. Is it possibly the p267 ref? Is it left to assume that there was Adam, there was John, and then there were titular bishops? Otherwise the pages are new and long enough. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:28, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, Sammi Brie. I counted two out of the three articles at the columbine nomination (the third I had already used up) as two QPQs. Sorry, I have no idea what I meant by "page 120". I had changed hooks quite a bit. Hamilton is quite explicit so there is no need to assume. See pages 84 (Banyas conquered, no successor to John appointed), 397 (succession of the resident bishops), and of course 266-267 for the titular bishops. Surtsicna (talk) 10:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
It's a bit of a compilation that requires a rat race search of Hamilton, but it seems to check out. We have Adam, we have John, and then we have a bunch of titular bishops. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:20, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, Sammi Brie. I counted two out of the three articles at the columbine nomination (the third I had already used up) as two QPQs. Sorry, I have no idea what I meant by "page 120". I had changed hooks quite a bit. Hamilton is quite explicit so there is no need to assume. See pages 84 (Banyas conquered, no successor to John appointed), 397 (succession of the resident bishops), and of course 266-267 for the titular bishops. Surtsicna (talk) 10:48, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
