Template:Did you know nominations/Dierk Raabe

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 14:11, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Dierk Raabe

(

)

Raabe at NTNU in 2022

... that Dierk Raabe (pictured) received €2.5 million from the European Research Council to work on Green Steel? Source: grant
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Zayn al-Din Qaraja

Created by FuzzyMagma (talk). Self-nominated at 14:53, 30 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Dierk Raabe; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Y Article is long enough (4079 characters), new enough (moved to mainspace on 29 March, nominated on 30 March) and article is within policy
Y Hook is short enough, interesting enough, in the article and well cited. Note: I have changed the link from [[Green Steel]] to [[Steelmaking#Strategies for reducing carbon emissions|Green Steel]] to comply with Wikipedia:DYKSG rule C1 (no links to redirects at DYK).
? The image on Commons is listed as freely licenced, but then the source for it is listed as a commercial website which doesn't look to be free (though the link [1] doesn't work). FuzzyMagma are you sure that this image is freely licenced? If the image is confirmed to be freely licenced, then it meets DYK's other criteria (in the article and looks fine at low resolution)
Y QPQ has been done
Overall, whilst the article is fine, the question on the licencing of the image needs to be addressed. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:36, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

@Joseph2302: thanks for your feedback. I trusted the image was free becuase of the image Metadata and the very high resolution of the image. I think this is the correct link [2] with the same copy right FuzzyMagma (talk) 12:17, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for providing the correct link, that page does list it at CC BY-SA 4.0, which is a free licence compatible with Wikipedia. So that's all fine then, this article and image are good to go. I will update the link on Commons for the image. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:51, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

@FuzzyMagma: The picture proposed and approved for this hook is not in the article. Cielquiparle (talk) 13:52, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

@Cielquiparle: done FuzzyMagma (talk) 13:55, 20 May 2023 (UTC)