Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Craig v. Radford

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Fuebaey (talk) 02:13, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Craig v. Radford

[edit]
  • Comment: Just added the "Basis" section to explain a pleading for the case

5x expanded by Seblake (talk). Self nominated at 02:01, 22 March 2015 (UTC).

  • An addition of a mere content does not constitute fivefold expansion. Why not make this article a Good Article instead? --George Ho (talk) 03:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
To explain more, a fivefold expansion means five times the previous revision (4,171 bytes in prose). The current revision, even with a new section, is not twenty or twenty-one kilobytes. WP:DYK rules don't count such expansion as "new" unless such rules prevent you from improving this project. Want me to explain more? George Ho (talk) 16:55, 24 March 2015 (UTC)