The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Hi Dumelow, this looks fine. In the edition of Moseley I checked the information was on page 77. Re the source for ALT1, see WP:SCHOLARSHIP, "Masters dissertations and theses are considered reliable only if they can be shown to have had significant scholarly influence", but I prefer ALT0 anyway. Good work. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:39, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks Gog the Mild, I didn't know that about Masters theses. It's only cited four times and I won't object if someone wants to remove it, but there are few good sources on this topic and I was glad of a more modern source to balance out Mosley - Dumelow (talk) 16:44, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Masters thesis: neither did I until it was pointed out to me in an early FAC. It can be a crying shame when useful, scholarly information which no one is questioning the accuracy of, has to be removed. Frankly I very much doubt it will be a problem below GA, and probably not until FAC. But I wanted to be clear to you and a the posting coordinator why I was rejecting ALT1 and even the possibility of adding "until the early 19th-century" to the end of ALT0. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:51, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Any objections to changing the hook to Alt0b: ...that a Court of Minstrels, led by a King of the Minstrels, regulated the trade of travelling musicians in parts of the medieval English Midlands?
I think that would make the hook even more interesting. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:44, 28 May 2020 (UTC)